Speaker summary
47% 69 analyzed articles/videos 1,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. military results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,323.584 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,547 analyzed words across 69 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,944 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. military is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. U.S. military
Speaker details
Total words: 1,547
Article count: 69
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score69 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst