Speaker summary
36% 178 analyzed articles/videos 6,091.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Central Command results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,122.79 hits . Analysis detected 4,105.342 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,091.333 analyzed words across 178 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,092 of 26,155 speakers). This U.S. Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. U.S. Central Command
Speaker details
Total words: 6,091.333
Article count: 178
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score178 analyzed videos6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst