Speaker summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos113.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tysen Duva results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 268 faulty-reasoning hits from 113.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,252 of 28,364 speakers). This Tysen Duva is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Tysen Duva
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
22.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos113.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos