Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Attorney's Office Northern District of Ohio results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 562 hits . Analysis detected 2,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,808 of 6,369 authors). This United States Attorney's Office Northern District of Ohio is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. United States Attorney's Office Northern District of Ohio
Author details
Total words: 3,111
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst