Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Troy Renck results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 149.976 hits. Analysis detected 1,213.882 faulty-reasoning hits from 442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Troy Renck is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Troy Renck
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 442
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos442 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.8%13.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos