Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Troy Meink results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.7% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,943 of 28,364 speakers). This Troy Meink is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Troy Meink
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
44.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.7%83.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 33.7%33.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.3%16.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos