Speaker summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 466.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Mueller results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hindsight Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 160.516 hits . Analysis detected 1,172.42 faulty-reasoning hits from 466.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (24,429 of 26,968 speakers). This Tom Mueller is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Tom Mueller
Speaker details
Total words: 466.667
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 9.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos466.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 28.9% 28.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 20.1% 20.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst