Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Wolfson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 312 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,768 of 26,819 speakers). This Todd Wolfson is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Todd Wolfson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
60.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos