Author summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 389 hits . Analysis detected 2,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,393 of 6,172 authors). This DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters
Author details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst