Speaker summary
⁠80%4 analyzed articles/videos155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the Trump administration results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 155 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (22,322 of 26,862 speakers). This the Trump administration is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
the Trump administration
Speaker details
Total words: 155
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
12.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos155 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.8%14.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos