Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the Times results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 38% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (11,759 of 26,780 speakers). This the Times is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
the Times

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
38.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 46.6%46.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 46.6%46.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 46.6%46.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 46.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 46.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 46.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos