Speaker summary
ā 87%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Spokesman-Review results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (4,288 of 28,364 speakers). This The Spokesman-Review is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
The Spokesman-Review
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 85%The Spokesman-Review (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos