Speaker summary
⁠79%4 analyzed articles/videos65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New Yorker results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 47% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 39.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,038 of 28,364 speakers). This The New Yorker is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
The New Yorker
Speaker details
Total words: 65
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
39.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos65 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 47.0%47.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos