Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the Hill results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,038 of 26,891 speakers). This the Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
the Hill
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos