Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,215 of 28,364 speakers). This The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos