Speaker summary
39%7 analyzed articles/videos28.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Editors results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 28.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of 54% (12,553 of 26,836 speakers). This The Editors is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
The Editors
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28.333
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
34.9% BS Score7 analyzed videos28.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.4%32.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate