Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video45.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teresa Giudice results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,967 of 28,364 speakers). This Teresa Giudice is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Teresa Giudice
Speaker details
Total words: 45.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
32.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos