Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video140.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terace Garnier results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 60.369 hits. Analysis detected 369.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 140.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,154 of 28,364 speakers). This Terace Garnier is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Terace Garnier
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠22%Terace Garnier (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 140.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
14.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos140.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos