Speaker summary
⁠27%3 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TEA results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 27 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,956 of 28,364 speakers). This TEA is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
TEA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
25.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos