Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebekah F. Ward results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 3,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,860 of 6,360 authors). This Rebekah F. Ward is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Rebekah F. Ward
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Rebekah F. Ward (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos