Speaker summary
⁠59%5 analyzed articles/videos260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tatyana Kim results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 97.117 hits. Analysis detected 392.117 faulty-reasoning hits from 260 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (21,974 of 25,929 speakers). This Tatyana Kim is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
11.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos260 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos