Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Clark Newberry results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 464 faulty-reasoning hits from 258 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,297 of 28,364 speakers). This Tara Clark Newberry is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Tara Clark Newberry
Speaker details
Total words: 258
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
20.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos258 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.6%37.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos