Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sudha David-Wilp results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 25.878 hits. Analysis detected 160.86 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,417 of 28,364 speakers). This Sudha David-Wilp is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Sudha David-Wilp
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
26.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.8%33.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.6%25.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.6%18.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.2%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos