Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stop the Sweeps results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 270.237 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (20,513 of 37,754 speakers). This Stop the Sweeps is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Stop the Sweeps
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠46%Stop the Sweeps (selected)28%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos125 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 53.2%53.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 53.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 5.2%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos