Author summary
27% 1 analyzed article/video 1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Keightley results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 265 hits . Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,896 of 8,291 authors). This Catherine Keightley is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Catherine Keightley
Author details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst