Publication summary
48% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 51st.news results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,014 hits . Analysis detected 10,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,445 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 21% (326 of 410 publications). This 51st.news is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 17,445
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst