Author summary
â 98% 1 analyzed article/video 744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malachi Byrd results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 867 hits . Analysis detected 2,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of â 86% (950 of 6,628 authors). This Malachi Byrd is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Malachi Byrd
Author details
Total words: 2,232
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.7% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 38.8% 38.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.3% 15.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 38.8%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst