Author summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Weiner results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 451 hits . Analysis detected 2,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (6,180 of 6,629 authors). This Rachel Weiner is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Rachel Weiner
Author details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst