Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stewart Schwartz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 237.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,112 of 28,364 speakers). This Stewart Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Stewart Schwartz
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
29.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.8%60.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos