Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stewart Patrick results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,183 of 28,364 speakers). This Stewart Patrick is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Stewart Patrick
Speaker details
Total words: 163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
29.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos163 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos