Speaker summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos58.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Jobs results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hindsight Bias, and No True Scotsman, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 193 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,869 of 28,364 speakers). This Steve Jobs is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Steve Jobs
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠55%Steve Jobs (selected)37%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
36.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos58.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos