Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Achenbach results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 549 faulty-reasoning hits from 384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (425 of 6,628 authors). This Joel Achenbach is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Joel Achenbach
Author details
Total words: 384
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.6% percentile 8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles384 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 23.2% 23.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.7% 24.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.1% 14.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.2% 17.2% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 23.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst