Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Zrike results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,850 of 26,884 speakers). This Stephen Zrike is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Stephen Zrike
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.0% percentile
83.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos