Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Weidle results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 236.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Weidle is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Stephanie Weidle
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos