Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Kopp results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 447 hits . Analysis detected 2,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,677 of 6,603 authors). This Emily Kopp is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Emily Kopp
Author details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst