Speaker summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 314.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Thomas results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Burden of Proof , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 50 hits . Analysis detected 425.613 faulty-reasoning hits from 314.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,563 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Stephanie Thomas
Speaker details
Total words: 314.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos314.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst