Author summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dion Nissenbaum results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,246 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (4,868 of 6,363 authors). This Dion Nissenbaum is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Dion Nissenbaum
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠24%Dion Nissenbaum (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,246
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510023.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos