Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Attorney General’s Office results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,770 of 26,000 speakers). This State Attorney General’s Office is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
State Attorney General’s Office
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos