Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacey Pearson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,699 of 26,432 speakers). This Stacey Pearson is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Stacey Pearson
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos