Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos93.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southern Poverty Law Center results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 92.7% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.5 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 92.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,844 of 28,364 speakers). This Southern Poverty Law Center is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Southern Poverty Law Center
Speaker details
Total words: 93.5
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
92.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos93.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 92.7%92.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 92.7%92.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 92.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos