Speaker summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos195.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sofia Cardenas results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 295.181 faulty-reasoning hits from 195.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (22,390 of 26,780 speakers). This Sofia Cardenas is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Sofia Cardenas

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
12.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos195.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos