Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video133.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sim Bilal results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.5% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 377.842 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,738 of 28,364 speakers). This Sim Bilal is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Sim Bilal
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 133.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos133.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.5%66.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.5%40.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.8%44.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos