Speaker summary
⁠39%3 analyzed articles/videos121.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Stoughton results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 43.779 hits. Analysis detected 123.779 faulty-reasoning hits from 121.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (21,006 of 26,511 speakers). This Seth Stoughton is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Seth Stoughton

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
14.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos121.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos