Speaker summary
52% 18 analyzed articles/videos 967.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Parnell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 2,562.007 faulty-reasoning hits from 967.333 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (25,551 of 26,155 speakers). This Sean Parnell is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Sean Parnell
Speaker details
Total words: 967.333
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score18 analyzed videos967.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst