Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Surovell results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 33.75 hits. Analysis detected 93.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,282 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Surovell is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Scott Surovell
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos