Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Nolan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.9% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Nolan is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Scott Nolan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 47.1%47.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos