Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Nolan results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anchoring Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,313 of 6,498 authors). This Scott Nolan is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Scott Nolan
Author details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.8% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst