Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Zone results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 64.8% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,147 of 27,498 speakers). This Science Zone is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Science Zone
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 64.8%64.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.1%24.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 64.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos