Speaker summary
⁠75%4 analyzed articles/videos390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hunter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 97.1% saturation with 393.375 hits. Analysis detected 673.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 390 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (16,736 of 27,807 speakers). This Sara Hunter is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Sara Hunter
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 390
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
24.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos390 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 97.1%97.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 97.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos