Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos287.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel Becker results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 335.178 faulty-reasoning hits from 287.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,753 of 28,364 speakers). This Samuel Becker is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Samuel Becker
Speaker details
Total words: 287.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos287.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos